Dallas Cowboys running back Rico Dowdle
The Dallas Cowboys’ running back-by-committee approach has been a topic of much discussion among fans and analysts alike. With a lack of a clear lead back, the question arises: would the Cowboys’ offense benefit from leaning on one primary ball carrier?
Let’s dive into the arguments for and against a one-lead-back system and examine whether it could be the key to unlocking the Cowboys’ offensive potential.
The Case for a One-Lead-Back System
Proponents of a one-lead-back system argue that it provides several benefits, including:
- Rhythm and Flow: A single lead back can establish a rhythm and get into a flow, allowing them to anticipate running lanes and react more decisively.
- Offensive Line Synergy: When offensive linemen work consistently with one running back, they develop a better understanding of their tendencies and can fine-tune their blocking schemes accordingly.
- Predictability for the Defense: While often seen as a negative, predictable play-calling can sometimes be advantageous. When a defense knows what to expect, it can create opportunities for play-action passes and misdirection plays.
Dallas Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott
The Case Against a One-Lead-Back System
Conversely, those who favor a running back-by-committee approach point to the following advantages:
- Reduced Wear and Tear: Sharing carries throughout the game reduces the physical toll on individual running backs, potentially extending their careers and keeping them fresher for crucial late-season games.
- Exploiting Matchups: Different running backs possess unique skill sets. A committee approach allows offensive coordinators to exploit favorable matchups by utilizing backs who excel in specific situations, such as pass-catching or short-yardage situations.
- Unpredictability for the Defense: A diverse running back rotation keeps defenses guessing, making it more challenging to game plan and adjust during the game.
The Cowboys’ Current Situation
Currently, the Cowboys are dividing carries between Rico Dowdle and Ezekiel Elliott, with neither back making a significant impact. Both backs have similar rushing yardage totals, with Dowdle holding a slight edge in receptions. However, the overall production from the running game has been underwhelming.
Dallas Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott
Could a One-Lead-Back System Work for Dallas?
Whether a one-lead-back system would benefit the Cowboys depends on several factors, including:
- Offensive Line Play: The effectiveness of any running game hinges on the performance of the offensive line. If the Cowboys’ offensive line struggles to create running lanes, it won’t matter who’s carrying the ball.
- Running Back Performance: For a one-lead-back system to succeed, the chosen back must consistently perform at a high level.
- Offensive Scheme: The Cowboys’ offensive scheme must complement the strengths of the chosen running back.
Conclusion
The decision of whether to commit to one lead back or maintain a committee approach is a complex one with no easy answers. The Cowboys must carefully weigh the pros and cons of each approach, considering factors such as player personnel, offensive line play, and overall team strategy.
Ultimately, the most crucial factor is finding a formula that maximizes the Cowboys’ offensive potential and leads to more victories.
